lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: jazz notation


From: Paul Scott
Subject: Re: jazz notation
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 09:43:16 -0700
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (X11/20040209)

José Luis Cruz wrote:

A 16/02/04 12:01:01
David Raleigh Arnold <address@hidden> escribió:

That's fine, but I don't see any problem with "Jazz 8ths".  You seem
to have the impression that jazz-swing 8ths are 2:1 triplets.  They
aren't even close.  I thought for some time that they were 3:2
quintuplets, but when I got to actually try ratios on the computer I
found that they are more like 17:15 or 33:31.  You need to consult
someone who has tested what the limits are, because I haven't, but a
triplet is a triplet for sure, not a jazz-swing 8th.


Simplifying it, i could say:


If you play normal 8ths... that's not jazzy

If you play triplets (4th 8th) / (2:1)... thats another thing, but
isn't jazz at all.


But if you try playing triplets (4th 8th) / (2:1) with the accent
in the last beat (and at reasonable speed), then you're closer to
what is jazz-swing. It's something between the last two, yep.

I agree with your interpretations of how to play it but a common notation at least in wind band music to indicate swing as ( eighth eighth = \times 2/3 { quarter eighth } ). I presume you know what I mean since it would have taken me much longer to write the way it is seen.

Paul Scott




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]