[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ot] SPAM/Worm problem (was: Accounts department)
From: |
Matthias Kilian |
Subject: |
[ot] SPAM/Worm problem (was: Accounts department) |
Date: |
Sun, 29 Feb 2004 14:05:31 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 11:18:51PM +0100, Vally an Leon wrote:
> Stop that nonsense!
Complaining about every single worm mail that's distributed on the
mailing list isn't really helpfull. Indeed, it doubles the amount of
useless mails.
For that worm problem: IMHO, the list owners should ASAP
a) make the list closed post (only subscribed members may post to the list),
b) if that worms come from a subscribed member, kick that member,
c) reject every mail containing attachments other than .ly or .png.
For Attachment checks, O recommend checking content type *and* name. Since
Windows seems to ignore the content type, malicious attachments often
are marked as text/plain (or other harmless types) but have a name like
foo.com or bar.txt.scr or thelike.
Regards,
Kili
- Accounts department, tommie, 2004/02/28
- Re: Accounts department, Vally an Leon, 2004/02/28
- [ot] SPAM/Worm problem (was: Accounts department),
Matthias Kilian <=
- [ot] SPAM/Worm problem (was: Accounts department), Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2004/02/29
- Re: [ot] SPAM/Worm problem (was: Accounts department), Nick Busigin, 2004/02/29
- Re: [ot] SPAM/Worm problem (was: Accounts department), Mark Van den Borre, 2004/02/29
- Re: [ot] SPAM/Worm problem (was: Accounts department), François Pinard, 2004/02/29
- Re: [ot] SPAM/Worm problem (was: Accounts department), Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2004/02/29
- Re: [ot] SPAM/Worm problem (was: Accounts department), Matthias Kilian, 2004/02/29