[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: another fingering question
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: |
Re: another fingering question |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Aug 2004 23:44:54 +0200 |
address@hidden writes:
> >
> >^ and _ are provided as a shorthand for:
> >
> > \override Script #'direction = UP/DOWN
>
> My only comment here is that (when using \markup) it does not appear to
> be a shorthand for *override*. It seems to be a shorthand for *specify*.
> In other words, an override is optional - but IME (2.2) ^ and _ are a
> necessity.
no, you can also leave out the direction, eg.
c-4
> > \markup { \finger "<DIGIT>" }
> >
> >Jan.
> >
> Seeing as we're discussing this, is there a mechanism whereby fingering
> can be added automatically? For example, " bes' " would always
> automatically be fingered "1" (brass players will recognise a transposed
> Bb :-)
No, but I can code it up for you, if you like! Very cheap, only $25
:-)
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys | address@hidden | http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
- another fingering question, korneel bernolet, 2004/08/10
- another fingering question, Carl D. Sorensen, 2004/08/11
- Re: another fingering question, David Raleigh Arnold, 2004/08/12
- Re: another fingering question, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2004/08/12
- Re: another fingering question, Anthony W. Youngman, 2004/08/23
- Re: another fingering question,
Han-Wen Nienhuys <=
- Re: another fingering question, Anthony W. Youngman, 2004/08/23
- Re: another fingering question, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2004/08/23
- Re: another fingering question, Anthony W. Youngman, 2004/08/23
Re: another fingering question, Cameron Horsburgh, 2004/08/25