Re: Double scripts and slurs

[Graham Percival]

On 3-Sep-04, at 12:12 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:

> address@hidden writes:
> > Judging from scm/script/scm, LilyPond appears to try to place the
> > accent underneath the slur.  My recollection is that the accent (the 
> > ->
> > kind) goes above the slur.  Comments?
>
> Yes: please check in multiple reputable scores, and -if necessary-
> apply changes to the script.scm file.

I think that this patch better reflects the way accents are placed.  
May I
apply it?

RCS file: /cvsroot/lilypond/lilypond/scm/script.scm,v
retrieving revision 1.22
diff -u -r1.22 script.scm
--- scm/script.scm      24 Aug 2004 22:17:20 -0000      1.22
+++ scm/script.scm      8 Sep 2004 16:43:16 -0000
@@ -10,10 +10,9 @@
          ((script-stencil . (feta . ("thumb"  . "thumb")))
           (direction . 1)))
         ("accent" .
-         ((inside-slur . #t)
-          (follow-into-staff . #t)
-          (script-stencil . (feta . ("sforzato" .  "sforzato")))
-          (side-relative-direction . -1)))
+         ((script-stencil . (feta . ("sforzato" .  "sforzato")))
+          (inside-slur . #f)
+          (side-relative-direction .  -1)))
         ("marcato" .
          ((script-stencil . (feta . ("dmarcato" . "umarcato")))
           (follow-into-staff . #t)