lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Polyphony and TabStaff Context


From: Mats Bengtsson
Subject: Re: Polyphony and TabStaff Context
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:18:08 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040803

The real problem is that the construct << {...} \\ {...} >>
only makes sense within ordinary staves, since it creates two new
Voice contexts.

If you want a corresponding version that works in the TabStaff
context, you have to do something like:

partitionTab = \notes {
  \relative c' {
  \time 3/4
c4 << \new TabVoice { \stemUp f d e } \new TabVoice { \stemDown b c2 } >>
  }
}

Also, watch out with your use of <<...>>. Only use them when you
actually want several simultaneous voices/staves/... Use {...}
otherwise:

\score {
  \context StaffGroup <<
    \context Staff {
        \clef "G_8"
        \partition
    }
    \context TabStaff {
        \partitionTab
    }
  >>
}

   /Mats

address@hidden wrote:
Hi all,

it seams, that there is a problem with polyphony and TabStaff context.

The notes get drawn twice in \context Staff and none in \context
TabStaff

greetings
Alexander


example:

\version "2.2.5"

partition = \notes {
  \relative c' {
  \time 3/4
  c4 << { f d e  } \\ { b c2 } >>
  }
}

\score {
  \context StaffGroup <<
    \context Staff <<
        \clef "G_8"
        \partition
    >>
    \context TabStaff <<
        \partition
    >>
  >>
}



_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

--
=============================================
        Mats Bengtsson
        Signal Processing
        Signals, Sensors and Systems
        Royal Institute of Technology
        SE-100 44  STOCKHOLM
        Sweden
        Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463                         
        Fax:   (+46) 8 790 7260
        Email: address@hidden
        WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe
=============================================




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]