lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Font problems in 2.3.24


From: Mats Bengtsson
Subject: Re: Font problems in 2.3.24
Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2004 11:07:47 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040913

I guess that the PDF file you get doesn't look too good, at least not
on screen, since it will contain bitmap fonts instead of vector fonts.

What LilyPond does internally, is to call dvips with the following
flags:
dvips -Ppdf -u+lilypond -u+ec-mftrace filename.dvi

What happens when you try this manually?
Maybe it's a problem with the the map file ec-mftrace.map.
The command
kpsewhich -format='PostScript header' ec-mftrace.map
should return something like
/usr/share/texmf/dvips/ec-fonts-mftraced/ec-mftrace.map

   /Mats

Alexandre Beneteau wrote:
Thanks for your reply,

I have no problem with missfonts (anyway kpsewhich ecrm10.pfa returns /usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/ec-fonts-mftraced/ecrm10.pfa)

Xdvi runs fine with dvi generated by lily ; but gv displays strange symbols for graces notes and fermata on bar.

Anyway, I dug a little more and I can get good postscript and pdf files starting with the dvi produced by lily using :
dvips -f -Z flute.dvi > flute.ps

This is dvips(k) 5.92b Copyright 2002 Radical Eye Software (www.radicaleye.com)
' TeX output 2004.10.30:1258' ->
dvips: Checksum mismatch in font feta20
dvips: Design size mismatch in font feta26
dvips: Checksum mismatch in font feta26
dvips: Design size mismatch in font feta13
dvips: Checksum mismatch in font feta13
dvips: Design size mismatch in font feta14
dvips: Checksum mismatch in font feta14
<texc.pro><music-drawing-routines.ps><special.pro>. [1] [2] [3] [4]

As you can see, there are still problems (even after having deleted the font caches), but the output is correctly displayed by gv (?)

I'm still using Pedro's packages of lilypond-2.3.24...

Hoping this will help to track the problem,

Thanks,

    Alex.
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:

address@hidden writes:

Thanks for your reply. I've just had a closer look at a few things, and I found a log file named missfont.log in my project directory, which contains the line

mktexpk --mfmode ljfour --bdpi 8000 --mag 1+0/8000 --dpi 8000 ecrm1000


Does this give any clues as to the problem?



yes - I suspect that the font package is installed incorrectly.
over here I have

    byrd:~/usr/src/lilypond$ kpsewhich ecrm10.pfa
    /usr/share/texmf/fonts/type1/public/ec-fonts-mftraced/ecrm10.pfa

what does kpsewhich say?



_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

--
=============================================
        Mats Bengtsson
        Signal Processing
        Signals, Sensors and Systems
        Royal Institute of Technology
        SE-100 44  STOCKHOLM
        Sweden
        Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463                         
        Fax:   (+46) 8 790 7260
        Email: address@hidden
        WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe
=============================================




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]