lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: why << >> in \score?


From: Mats Bengtsson
Subject: Re: why << >> in \score?
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 10:14:25 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040913

It's very simple, the syntax {A B} means that A and B should follow
eachother, whereas << A B >> means that A and B should happen
simultaneously. See
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.4/Documentation/user/out-www/lilypond/Music-expressions-explained.html#Music-expressions-explained

   /Mats

Francois Planiol-Auger wrote:
Hi,

Thanks to Maurizio, I nested the different parts with << {} // {} >> and it
works fine.

But I would be able to make better work if I could understand why making
expression for everything is for lilypond important? Expression for the
whole score, for singers parts etc. Why doesnt it work only with a syntax
like:

\score {
        \new StaffGroup {
                \new Staff {
                        \new Voice { ... }
                        ...
                }
                ...
                \new Lyrics {
                        \new Stanza { ... }
                        ...
                }
        }
}

Why must be used these << that makes for the beginner a big difficulty for
building a system? Why are the brackets not enough?
Why is it not necessary for Lyrics parts?

François, asking maybe a very silly question...



_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

--
=============================================
        Mats Bengtsson
        Signal Processing
        Signals, Sensors and Systems
        Royal Institute of Technology
        SE-100 44  STOCKHOLM
        Sweden
        Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463                         
        Fax:   (+46) 8 790 7260
        Email: address@hidden
        WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe
=============================================




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]