Re: \oneVoice and \voiceXX commands having the wrong scope

[Mats Bengtsson]

Sorry for the confusion! Taking another look at Yuval's second example,
the simple explanation is of course that he doesn't use the \\ feature
at all. In fact,
    << {\voiceOne r1-"voiceOne"} >>
does not create any new context at all, it's actually equivalent to
      \voiceOne r1-"voiceOne"

Yuval, consider the following example:

\context Voice = main {
  c1^"In the main voice"
  <<{ c1^"Still in the main voice" }
    \new Voice{c1^"A newly created second voice"} >>
  c1^"Again, still in the main voice"
}

   /Mats

Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> address@hidden writes:
>
> > Hackers: Is my guess below correct? In that case, wouldn't it be better
> > to change the routine that invents new context identifiers so it never
> > gives the names "1", ..., "4"?
>
>
> "1" to "4" are only assigned by << \\  >> . Default names are either
> empty or "\new" (for \new Contexts)

--
=============================================
        Mats Bengtsson
        Signal Processing
        Signals, Sensors and Systems
        Royal Institute of Technology
        SE-100 44  STOCKHOLM
        Sweden
        Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463                         
        Fax:   (+46) 8 790 7260
        Email: address@hidden
        WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe
=============================================