[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: contemporary notation: slashed gracenote beams
From: |
Christ van Willegen |
Subject: |
Re: contemporary notation: slashed gracenote beams |
Date: |
Tue, 8 Feb 2005 11:44:59 +0100 |
It's hard to see from my point of view, but as far as I can tell the
slash is through the flag and the beam...
But you're right... it seems that the standard \acciaccatura shows
exactly what I was refering to.
On Tue, 08 Feb 2005 11:37:01 +0100, Mats Bengtsson
<address@hidden> wrote:
> That's a slashed flag, not a slashed beam. Also, it's in the first
> example you find if you look up the section on Grace Notes in the
> LilyPond manual, so why would Thomas ask about that?
>
> /Mats
>
> Christ van Willegen wrote:
> > Hi Mats, list,
> >
> > this http://www.iteaonline.org/Journal/32N1/32N1ornamentation.shtml is
> > probably what he's looking for. See example 2, measure 3.
> >
> >
> >>Can you point to some example (preferably some score available on-line
> >>or a scanned copy) that shows the layout you are looking for?
> >>
> >> /Mats
> >>
> >>Thomas Scharkowski wrote:
> >>
> >>>Slashed gracenote beams for "as fast as possible" are quite common. I
> >>>think they are not implemented, at least I did not find in the doc.
> >>>Any tricks?
> >
> >
> > Christ van Willegen
>
> --
> =============================================
> Mats Bengtsson
> Signal Processing
> Signals, Sensors and Systems
> Royal Institute of Technology
> SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM
> Sweden
> Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463
> Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260
> Email: address@hidden
> WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe
> =============================================
>
Re: contemporary notation: slashed gracenote beams, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2005/02/08