lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: i´ve got a problem


From: Szabó Árpád Zoltán
Subject: Re: i´ve got a problem
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 18:08:30 +0200

All agreed. No offense taken nor meant from my part too.

Friendly, :-)
Árpád
----- Original Message -----
From: "Roman Stöckl-Schmidt" <address@hidden>
To: <address@hidden>
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 3:49 PM
Subject: Re: i´ve got a problem


> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Szabó Árpád Zoltán wrote on 29.03.2005 10:33:
> | I have to confess that I have connected PC-s with printer cable (at
> least I
> | thought it was printer cable) long time ago, and I don't recall the
exact
> | method, so you may well right.
> | I just checked Total Commander (do you know this software), which
supports
> | this, and its help speaks about  "Direct cable connection through
parallel
> | port". I quote a short passage, if it makes more sense.
> | <quote start>
> | The PORT connection through the parallel port allows to transfer data
> | between two computers in the same room over a special parallel cable.
This
> | cable can be found in most computer shops under the name
> "Interlink/Laplink
> | parallel cable" or "parallel cable for direct cable connection". It
> allows a
> | transfer rate of about 50kB/sec. The function therefore cannot be used
> as a
> | network, but is meant to synchronize data between two machines (e.g. a
> | desktop and a notebook). You need a pair of network cards for a
permanent
> | connection.
> | <quote end>
>
> I have to confess I forgot the fact that most printer cables today are
> bi-directional and that makes them capable of transferring data between
> PCs just as well as a serial link cable. So my bad, I just hadn't done
> this with a parallel cable personally, because when I needed to do this
> parallel cables weren't bi-directional and so there was no alternative
> to serial links for me.
> So just excuse my being ignorant, please. =)
>
> | However, I mentioned it as a tip, I believe "the" problem was not with
the
> | physical method of moving the files from one computer to another, but
what
> | files from where, and what to do with those, i.e. the usage of Cygwin
> | setup.exe.
>
> That's certainly true, I'm just a person that's always eager to learn
> and so I presume of others that they are too. After all the net is a
> place where you have lots of information but most is not verifiable and
> unfortunately many people think that they have the obligation to express
> an opinion where the really have the RIGHT to.
> This is not meant as an offense because I feel it doesn't have much to
> do with the issue discussed above, it's more of a philospohical point of
> view.
>
> Regards from Germany, Roman.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFCSVzen0kyIx7rF68RAhT4AJ9xmxDeBK8X+6FGVO+Hajg5x6xLRACgmQex
> mh5LzfxdjKvudnFWEeRDvBE=
> =YQgW
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]