[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Solfeggio
From: |
Bernard Hurley |
Subject: |
Re: Solfeggio |
Date: |
Sun, 24 Apr 2005 21:28:29 +0100 |
I guess its partly a matter of what you use Lilypond for. If you are
basically encoding music that has already been written then It may well
be easiest to use relative entry. However I have a large number of
lilypond scores that are "works in progress" - pieces I am writing.
These are revised/edited quite heavily and I find this almost impossible
if the score uses relative notation.
/Bernard
> I have and I wouldn't want to go back to absolute entry. At least until
> we find out what Nicolas' editor does.
>
> Paul Scott
>
- Re: Notes in Key Sig, (continued)
- Re: Notes in Key Sig, Nicolas Sceaux, 2005/04/23
- Re: Notes in Key Sig, Bernard Hurley, 2005/04/23
- Re: Notes in Key Sig, Nicolas Sceaux, 2005/04/23
- Message not available
- Re: Solfeggio (was:)Notes in Key Sig, Bernard Hurley, 2005/04/23
- Re: Solfeggio, Nicolas Sceaux, 2005/04/24
- Re: Solfeggio, darius, 2005/04/24
- Re: Solfeggio, Nicolas Sceaux, 2005/04/24
- RE: Solfeggio, Fairchild, 2005/04/24
- RE: Solfeggio, darius, 2005/04/24
- Re: Solfeggio, Paul Scott, 2005/04/24
- Re: Solfeggio,
Bernard Hurley <=
- Re: Solfeggio, dax2, 2005/04/24
- Re: Solfeggio, Nicolas Sceaux, 2005/04/26
- Re: Solfeggio, joe ferguson, 2005/04/24
- Re: Solfeggio, Bernard Hurley, 2005/04/24
- Re: Notes in Key Sig, David Raleigh Arnold, 2005/04/25
- Re: Notes in Key Sig, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2005/04/25
- Re: Notes in Key Sig, Bernard Hurley, 2005/04/26
Re: Notes in Key Sig, Erik Sandberg, 2005/04/23