|
From: | Paul Scott |
Subject: | Re: missing term in Icking glossary |
Date: | Fri, 29 Jul 2005 13:04:24 -0700 |
User-agent: | Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050602) |
joe ferguson wrote:
My experience is pretty well limited the choral literature. In that genre the usual interpretation of the tenuto is one of subtle emphasis, as an indication of phrasing.IOW I don't care what you call it. I just want to be able to engrave the musical symbol. We could discuss how to interpret it for a long time but that's not really the job of the LilyPond docs.Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:I would say that this is a more universal observation. E.g. the interpretation of sfz , > and ^ also depend on the composer/era.
Paul Scott
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |