lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: version 2.6.x for debian (unstable or sarge)?


From: David Fedoruk
Subject: Re: version 2.6.x for debian (unstable or sarge)?
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 15:51:44 -0700

On 9/19/05, Roland Goretzki <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi at all,
>
> during the last month's I wasn't able to work with lilypond.
> Now I think it would be better to update or new install 2.6.x or higher.
It seems the Debian people are out of the loop on this package. I use
wajig (super set of apt package management) so update my systems.
Command wajig news (pakagename)

wajig news lilypond :
--------- snip -----------
" Description:
lilypond   - A program for typesetting sheet music
  lilypond-data - LilyPond music typesetter (data files)
lilypond1.3 - Dummy package for transition to new stable lilypond
Changes:
lilypond (2.4.5-2) unstable; urgency=low
  * debian/control (Build-Depends): Build system demands you have
ec-fonts-mftraced installed to build, so do it. "

That's why we don't have a 2.6 *stable* lilyond on Debian when the Red
Hat Folks do. This is a pretty active list and I think we can generate
enough noise to get this changed. Lilypond at this point is any but
unstable and the urgency is not LOW by any means. I believe we no
longer use EC fonts and feta is the standard.

-------------- end snip --------

wajig has a facility for using an rpm to install from, i haven't tried
this but I know people have used it with some success.

I just don't know who to talk to at Debian to let them know there is a
sizable community out here interested and using this package! I think
the DiMuDi/Agnuala people do though!  I posted a few weeks ago about
this iissue and Russel Harris asked where I'd seen the quote about its
"low urgency" and i couldnt' remember.. here it is now! Perhaps we can
get this changed.

DF


--
David Fedoruk
B.Mus. UBC,1986
Certificate in Internet Systems Administration, UBC, 2003

"Music is enough for one's life time, but one life time is not enough
for music" Sergei Rachmaninov




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]