lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Displaying the first bar number


From: Daniel Johnson
Subject: Re: Displaying the first bar number
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 20:59:20 -0700
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050811)

Behavior also confirmed in latest 2.7 CVS

Fairchild wrote:

Daniel -

With 2.4.6 your code gives 15 on the first line and 20 on the second.

Bug in 2.6.3?

                    - Bruce

-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Johnson [mailto:address@hidden Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 6:28 PM
To: Fairchild
Cc: 'Lilypond User'
Subject: Re: Displaying the first bar number


Nope.  Here's my test.ly:

\version "2.6.3"

{
   \set Score.currentBarNumber = #15
   \repeat unfold 5 c'1 \break
   \repeat unfold 5 c'1
}

On the 2nd line, I get the bar number (20) but not on the first line.

--Daniel

Fairchild wrote:

Daniel -

Try this:

\version "2.4.6"
{ \set Score.currentBarNumber = #123
a'1 a' a' }

                          - Bruce

-----Original Message-----
From: address@hidden
[mailto:address@hidden On Behalf Of Daniel Johnson
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 3:38 PM
To: Lilypond User
Subject: Displaying the first bar number


Dear list,

Because I am typesetting a fragment of a larger work, I would like to display the bar number on the first line. By default Lilypond does not do so, but begins displaying it on line 2. In ly/engraver-init.ly, we encounter the following line:
  barNumberVisibility = #default-bar-number-visibility
and in scm/output-lib.scm we see this:
(define-public (default-bar-number-visibility barnum) (> barnum 1)) So, it seemed like I should be able to do the following:
  \set Score.barNumberVisibility = ##t
but this has no effect.  I also tried this:
#(define-public (default-bar-number-visibility barnum) (#t)) but, as expected, it didn't work either.

If anyone can shed light on this, I'll gladly write up a blurb on it for inclusion in the manual. (I searched and didn't find anything there, so please forgive if it's there and I missed it.) I am using version 2.6.3 on Linux.

--Daniel





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]