Re: Fink's Lilypond 2.6.3 and tex backend

[Henrik Frisk]

Christian Ebert <address@hidden> wrote:

> * Julien Salort on Sunday, October 09, 2005:
> > I'm using lilypond on Mac OS X 10.4.2 installed by fink (Package manager
> > version: 0.24.10, Distribution version: 0.8.0.rsync).
> > It works great to output Postscript.
> > 
> > However, I can't use the tex backend to get a DVI file.
> > I get :
> >% lilypond -b tex Exo.ly
> > GNU LilyPond 2.6.3
> > can't open the file with dlopen: libkpathsea.so: dlopen(libkpathsea.so,
> > 1): image not found
> > install the package: libkpathsea3 (teTeX 2.x) or libkpathsea4 (teTeX
> > 3.x)
> > 
> > It seems to me that libkpathsea4 *is* installed :
> >% fink list kpathsea
> > Information about 5031 packages read in 1 seconds.
> > i   libkpathsea4     3.0-2        Complete distribution of the TeX
> > typesett...
> > i   libkpathsea4...  3.0-2        Shared libraries for a teTeX
> > installation
> > 
> > However, I don't have any libkpathsea.so on my computer.
> > I only have :
> > /sw/lib/libkpathsea.4.0.0.dylib
> > /sw/lib/libkpathsea.4.dylib
> > /sw/lib/libkpathsea.a
> > /sw/lib/libkpathsea.dylib
> > /sw/lib/libkpathsea.la
> 
> The same holds true for a self compiled teTeX and lilypond on
> MacOS 10.3.9 and libkpathsea in /usr/local/teTeX/lib.
> 
> I wanted to try the fink package (which would have meant to get
> another teTeX less customized for my needs) but apparently it has
> the same issue.
> 
> When lilypond was at 1.+ using lilypond-book worked just fine.
> And this is what I need because I want to use lilypond note
> engraving /inside/ LaTeX-documents mainly and also use the fonts
> that are set up in my teTeX for e.g song lyrics.
> 
> I also tried the installation via disk image but it is useless
> for that purpose too.
> 
> > Is there a way to solve this problem ?
> 
> Is there?
> 
I thought I had the tex backend working on my system (OSX + Fink) but it
must have been with lilypond-book - I get the same error. I have
forwarded this to the Fink package maintainer (maybe you have already
done that).