lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Source RPMS? ghostscript-devel RPMS?


From: Nick Urbanik
Subject: Re: Source RPMS? ghostscript-devel RPMS?
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 03:45:02 +1100
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i

On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 03:21:50AM +1100, Nick Urbanik wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 11:41:15AM +0100, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> > Nick Urbanik wrote:
> > > Dear Folks,
> > >
> > > I want to install Lilypond on Fedora Core 4.  I am so grateful for
> > > the effort that you folks have put into it.  Unfortunately I
> > > cannot install it, since an appropriate ghostscript-devel seems to
> > > be unavailable, and a number of other things I need depend on
> > > that, including ImageMagick-devel-6.2.2.0-3.fc4.0.i386.
> > >
> > > Besides, I have a thing about source, and am nervous about
> > > breaking printing without the ability to see how the RPM is built.
> > >
> > > I have looked around http://www.lilypond.org/download/ and can
> > > find no source RPMS and also no
> > > ghostscript-devel-8.15rc3-0.i386.rpm.
> > >
> > > Are the *.src.rpm  files available?
> > 
> > I actually forgot which they were. it's probably easier to follow
> > the instructions at the bottom of the install page.
> 
> Okay, ghostscript-8.15.1-3.1.src.rpm is available from "rawhide"; have
> built it okay.  It's a bit alarming that Red Hat didn't sign the file.
> 
> Now the next question: is ghostscript-libs-7.07-41.i386.rpm made from
> a hacked up ghostscript-7.07-41.src.rpm from Fedora Core 4 updates?  I
> have just done this:
> 
> * edit ghostscript.spec from ghostscript-7.07-41.src.rpm,
> * add a new package libs, add %package libs %description libs,
>   %files libs
> * then rpmbuild -ba ghostscript.spec
> 
> Is that what you folks did?  If so, where is the hacked up spec file
> or hacked up source rpm?
> 
> The results of my labours are at http://nicku.org/ftp/lilypond/

Now I have the problem that ghostscript-8.15.1-3.1.i386.rpm and
ghostscript-libs-7.07-41.i386.rpm both provide the files
/usr/lib/libijs.so and /usr/lib/libgs.so:

$ rpm -qlvp ghostscript-8.15.1-3.1.i386.rpm | grep /usr/lib/lib
lrwxrwxrwx    1 root    root               13 Dec 21 02:34 /usr/lib/libgs.so -> 
libgs.so.8.15
lrwxrwxrwx    1 root    root               13 Dec 21 02:34 /usr/lib/libgs.so.8 
-> libgs.so.8.15
-rwxr-xr-x    1 root    root          4698844 Dec 21 02:35 
/usr/lib/libgs.so.8.15
-rwxr-xr-x    1 root    root            16468 Dec 21 02:35 
/usr/lib/libijs-0.35.so
lrwxrwxrwx    1 root    root               14 Dec 21 02:34 /usr/lib/libijs.so 
-> libijs-0.35.so

I built 
 rpm -qlvp ghostscript-compat-libs-7.07-41.1nu.i386.rpm
lrwxrwxrwx    1 root    root               13 Dec 21 03:34 /usr/lib/libgs.so.7 
-> libgs.so.7.07
-rwxr-xr-x    1 root    root          3817056 Dec 21 03:34 
/usr/lib/libgs.so.7.07

but now:
$ sudo rpm -Uhv ghostscript-*8.15.1-3.1.i386.rpm 
ghostscript-compat-libs-7.07-41.1nu.i386.rpm
Password:
error: Failed dependencies:
        libijs.so is needed by (installed) gimp-print-4.2.7-7.i386

So what am I doing wrong?
-- 
Nick Urbanik   RHCE       http://nicku.org          nicku(at)nicku.org
Proud ex-member of Dept. of Information & Communications Technology in
Hong Kong IVE (Tsing Yi), Home of Visual Paradigm: Jolt Productivity
Award winner, programmed by ICT's own graduates!
GPG: 7FFA CDC7 5A77 0558 DC7A 790A 16DF EC5B BB9D 2C24    ID: BB9D2C24

Attachment: pgpgDGAaVEkut.pgp
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]