lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Music function arguments


From: Fairchild
Subject: RE: Music function arguments
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:38:20 -0600

Please explain.  Maybe post the beginning of the thread, which seems to be
missing from the archives - or has a different subject line.

Thanks.

                                 - Bruce

-----Original Message-----
From: address@hidden
[mailto:address@hidden On Behalf Of
Trevor Baca
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 4:49 PM
To: Han-Wen Nienhuys
Cc: address@hidden; address@hidden; Nicolas Sceaux
Subject: Re: Music function arguments


On 12/14/05, Han-Wen Nienhuys <address@hidden> wrote:
> Trevor Bača wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > I agree, if for no other reason than to reduce the number of flips 
> > over to the manual while inputting.
> >
> > Of course, it probably would be better for *everything* to be
> >
> >   \command "arg"
> >
> > removing the kinda alien-looking (if you're not a scheme programmer)
>
> ACtually, this turned out to be trivial to do. I'm not sure why I 
> didn't do it earlier.

Well hallelujah. This part of the peanut gallery says go for it before the
userbase gets any bigger (resulting in more backwards compatability
complaints).


--
Trevor Bača
address@hidden






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]