lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: lilypond-user Digest, Vol 39, Issue 22


From: michel pondeville
Subject: Re: lilypond-user Digest, Vol 39, Issue 22
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:18:22 +0100

Good night,
When lilypond shoult recognise the strong pzzicato.
Thank you
Michel


----- Original Message ----- From: <address@hidden>
To: <address@hidden>
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 9:43 AM
Subject: lilypond-user Digest, Vol 39, Issue 22


Send lilypond-user mailing list submissions to
address@hidden

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
address@hidden

You can reach the person managing the list at
address@hidden

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of lilypond-user digest..."


Today's Topics:

  1. Re:raggedbottom (Art Hixson)
  2. Re:illegal instruction in GUB 2.7.33-1 (Han-Wen Nienhuys)
  3. Stickings/Fingerings (Jay Bordeleau)
  4. Re:Don't understand exactly where to put Completion lines
     (Jay Hamilton, Sound and Silence)
  5. Re:illegal instruction in GUB 2.7.33-1 (Paul Scott)
  6. Re:Putting Lyrics between barlines / Lyrics and \appogiatura
     (Trent J)
  7. Re:illegal instruction in GUB 2.7.33-1 (Paul Scott)
  8. Markup in text (Don Blaheta)
  9. Clef signs (Don Blaheta)
 10. Re:illegal instruction in GUB 2.7.33-1 (Han-Wen Nienhuys)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 11:18:10 -0800
From: Art Hixson <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: raggedbottom
To: Paul Scott <address@hidden>
Cc: address@hidden
Message-ID: <address@hidden>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Running 2.6.4-5 on XP and no errors were reported from the compiler.  I
didn't prepend a class membership, however, as the docs didn't suggest I
needed to -- was a class necessary?

Paul Scott wrote:

Art Hixson wrote:

I have a \book in which one of the scores is only three staves long.
These got spread across the page, of course, and I wanted to have a
more normal spacing.  Rummaging around in the archives brought up the
raggedbottom and raggedlastbottom concepts.  I tried both of these,
both in \paper and \layout, both true and false -- nothing.  I got
what I wanted by a rather ugly hack which took a lot of research time:

   b4. c8 f,2 g2      c2. ~ c2   \bar ":|"    % end of piece

   \stopStaff
   \override Staff.Clef #'transparent = ##t
   \override Staff.KeySignature #'transparent = ##t
   \override Score.BarNumber  #'break-visibility = #all-invisible
     s1*200     %lots of padding

Isn't there a more elegant way? And what's the meaning of the ragged
bits if they don't do anything in this situation?


You didn't tell us what version you are running.  I believe there have
been times when raggedbottom hasn't been correct.  I just tested a 3
line example (with 'raggedbottom = ##t' in the paper block) with
2.7.33 and it worked perfectly.  I have also found in the past that if
there are other errors in your code (Lilypond input) raggedbottom
gives undesired results.

Paul Scott







--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.6/257 - Release Date: 2006/02/10





------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 20:40:12 +0100
From: Han-Wen Nienhuys <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: illegal instruction in GUB 2.7.33-1
To: Paul Scott <address@hidden>
Cc: address@hidden
Message-ID: <address@hidden>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Paul Scott wrote:
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:

Paul Scott wrote:


This is a different machine (i386) with a new installation of Debian
sid that has not run Lily yet.

ldd -v `which lilypond`  gives:

not a dynamic executable.



I'm looking for the output of the binary which will be in
/usr/local/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond

preferably with LD_LIBRARY_PATH setting done by /usr/local/bin/lilypond


ok.
ldd looks fine.

what kind of machine is this (CPU)? Can you run lilypond in GDB, and
send a backtrace of the exception?

thanks.

--
 Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen




------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 19:20:28 +0000 (UTC)
From: Jay Bordeleau <address@hidden>
Subject: Stickings/Fingerings
To: address@hidden
Message-ID: <address@hidden>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Good day-
First day out on the lilypond is going great, just one issue:
I was hoping to add percussion stickings to some music
(R L R R L R L,  L=left r=right).
I was hoping that this could be done similar to fingerings,
but L and R don't seem to be supported.
Any ideas how to get around this?
thanks
jay :)






------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 11:51:38 -0800
From: "Jay Hamilton, Sound and Silence" <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: Don't understand exactly where to put Completion lines
To: Mats Bengtsson <address@hidden>
Cc: address@hidden, "address@hidden list"
<address@hidden>
Message-ID: <address@hidden>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed

I snipped the part right under the 'header' but here's
from the top the beginning of the file

\version "2.6.3"
\header {
  title = "Thunder/Perfect Mind"
  composer = "Jay Hamilton"
  subtitle = "Adapted by the composer from various
translations/Texts found Nag Hamadi"
  copyright = "CC lic.#2.5 some rights reserved Jay
Hamilton 1998"

}
#(set-global-staff-size 19)
Key = { \key c \major }
SopranoA = \relative c' {
\set Staff.instrument = #"Soprano 1"
\set Staff.midiInstrument = "Accordian"
\clef treble
\cadenzaOn
%notes begin here

Hope this is enough of an example.
Jay

Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Since you didn't include the part of your file where you actually use
the SopranoA variable, it's impossible to accurately answer your question.

  /Mats

Quoting "Jay Hamilton, Sound and Silence" <address@hidden>:

I would like to use the autocompletion in my score however when I
looked at the manual I got confused as to where exactly to put this
[copied from manual];
\new Voice \with {
  \remove "Note_heads_engraver"
  \consists "Completion_heads_engraver"
} {
  c2. c8 d4 e f g a b c8 c2 b4 a g16 f4 e d c8. c2
}
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
in my score [example]

Key = { \key c \major }
SopranoA = \relative c' {
\set Staff.instrument = #"Soprano 1"
\set Staff.midiInstrument = "Accordian"
\clef treble
\cadenzaOn


I'm sure it's simple but like I said I got confused
Jay



--
Childhood is a Journey not a race- Emma Sadinsky aged 8
Jay Hamilton
Sound and Silence
206-328-7694
www.soundand.com


_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user






--
Childhood is a Journey not a race- Emma Sadinsky aged 8
Jay Hamilton
Sound and Silence
206-328-7694
www.soundand.com




------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 22:18:45 -0700
From: Paul Scott <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: illegal instruction in GUB 2.7.33-1
Cc: address@hidden
Message-ID: <address@hidden>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:

Paul Scott wrote:

Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:


I'm looking for the output of the binary which will be in
/usr/local/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond

preferably with LD_LIBRARY_PATH setting done by /usr/local/bin/lilypond


ok.
ldd looks fine.

what kind of machine is this (CPU)?

i386 - AMD K6

Can you run lilypond in GDB, and send a backtrace of the exception?

Yes,  I will do that ASAP and get back to you.

Thanks,

Paul





------------------------------

Message: 6
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:22:09 +1100
From: "Trent J" <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: Putting Lyrics between barlines / Lyrics and \appogiatura
To: address@hidden, address@hidden
Message-ID: <address@hidden>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/lilypond-user/attachments/20060213/8e1af928/attachment.html

------------------------------

Message: 7
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 23:47:01 -0700
From: Paul Scott <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: illegal instruction in GUB 2.7.33-1
To: address@hidden
Message-ID: <address@hidden>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:

Paul Scott wrote:

Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:

Paul Scott wrote:


This is a different machine (i386) with a new installation of
Debian sid that has not run Lily yet.

ldd -v `which lilypond`  gives:

not a dynamic executable.




I'm looking for the output of the binary which will be in
/usr/local/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond

preferably with LD_LIBRARY_PATH setting done by /usr/local/bin/lilypond



ok.
ldd looks fine.

what kind of machine is this (CPU)? Can you run lilypond in GDB, and
send a backtrace of the exception?

I hope the attached file is what you need,

Paul

-------------- next part --------------
Program received signal SIGILL, Illegal instruction.
0xb7ed8d04 in __gmpz_init_set_si ()
  from /usr/local/lilypond/usr/bin/../lib/libgmp.so.3
(gdb) bt
#0  0xb7ed8d04 in __gmpz_init_set_si ()
  from /usr/local/lilypond/usr/bin/../lib/libgmp.so.3
#1  0x00000004 in ?? ()
#2  0xb7fddad0 in _dl_rtld_di_serinfo () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2
#3  0xb7f5dbb3 in scm_init_numbers ()
  from /usr/local/lilypond/usr/bin/../lib/libguile.so.16
#4  0xb7f5200a in scm_i_init_guile ()
  from /usr/local/lilypond/usr/bin/../lib/libguile.so.16
#5  0xb7f937d1 in scm_leave_guile ()
  from /usr/local/lilypond/usr/bin/../lib/libguile.so.16
#6  0xb7f93855 in scm_i_with_guile_and_parent ()
  from /usr/local/lilypond/usr/bin/../lib/libguile.so.16
#7  0xb7f938be in scm_with_guile ()
  from /usr/local/lilypond/usr/bin/../lib/libguile.so.16
#8  0xb7f51def in scm_boot_guile ()
  from /usr/local/lilypond/usr/bin/../lib/libguile.so.16

#9  0x080ee892 in ?? ()
#10 0xb7baaed0 in __libc_start_main () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
#11 0x0804e1c1 in ?? ()

------------------------------

Message: 8
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 01:54:57 -0600
From: Don Blaheta <address@hidden>
Subject: Markup in text
To: address@hidden
Message-ID: <address@hidden>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

In section 8.1.4 of the docs it says that markup can be used anywhere
text is called in lilypond, and then gives a bunch of examples.  But I
can't get

 \set stanza = \markup { "R." }

or anything like it to work---what am I doing wrong?  This is on LP
2.7.33 on OS X, and yes, I am planning to do something more complicated
with the markup, I just want to get it working first.

--
-=-Don address@hidden<http://www.blahedo.org/>-=-
I've never had major knee surgery on any other part of my body.
--Winston Bennett, University of Kentucky basketball forward




------------------------------

Message: 9
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 02:02:41 -0600
From: Don Blaheta <address@hidden>
Subject: Clef signs
To: address@hidden
Message-ID: <address@hidden>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Boy, I'm just full of questions tonight.  I see that when the
Bar_engraver is removed, the clef signs no longer appear at the start of
each line.  I don't mind that terribly, but I would like to be able to
force one, and that I can't figure out how to do.  If I just throw in a
"\clef treble", it puts a clef at the end of the previous line as
well....

I think I can work around the problem if I just start a fresh file for
each place I want a new clef sign, but that's a pain and I'd rather not
if I don't have to. :)

Once again, using 2.7.33 on OS X.  Thanks!

--
-=-Don address@hidden<http://www.blahedo.org/>-=-
I cannot conceive that anybody will require multiplications at the rate
of 40,000 or even 4,000 per hour ... --F. H. Wales (1936)




------------------------------

Message: 10
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 09:44:51 +0100
From: Han-Wen Nienhuys <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: illegal instruction in GUB 2.7.33-1
To: Paul Scott <address@hidden>
Cc: address@hidden
Message-ID: <address@hidden>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Paul Scott wrote:

what kind of machine is this (CPU)?


i386 - AMD K6

Have you ever run a prepackaged 2.7 binary successfully?

K6 is a very old chip which doesn't support SSE2 (which I suspect is
used in the GMP library)

--
 Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen




------------------------------

_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


End of lilypond-user Digest, Vol 39, Issue 22
*********************************************





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]