[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Spacing bug in 2.8.2?
From: |
Kieren MacMillan |
Subject: |
Re: Spacing bug in 2.8.2? |
Date: |
Thu, 8 Jun 2006 08:41:13 -0400 |
Hi, Mats (et al.) --
The problem and its solution is described in
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2005-11/msg00060.html
Well, a *related* problem and its solution is described there... ;-)
However, in general I have felt that beginning- and end-of-measure
spacing has altered dramatically (not for the better) in the past
version or so -- you may remember several postings (by me and others)
on this issue.
For example, I now find that:
1. nearly *every* "carry-over" slur and tie essentially
disappears (n.b., this behavior is seen in Shamus's example as well);
2. accidentals, arpeggios, etc., attached to a measure's first
note are almost always within only a few points of the bar line
itself (and in some cases actually *touch* the bar line!);
3. noteheads themselves sometimes (but much less often than
other Objects) seem too close to the bar line (leading and trailing).
None of these were a problem a few versions ago -- I would really
love to know what has happened to effect this change, and where the
spacing code is located so I could revert this.
Alas, nobody seems to have the answer! =)
Best regards,
Kieren.