[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Three more questions: centered instr. names / neomensural noteheads
From: |
Mats Bengtsson |
Subject: |
Re: Three more questions: centered instr. names / neomensural noteheads / incipit |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Jun 2006 14:49:55 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20060417 |
AmXlie Aubut wrote:
2) If the modern clefs were right beside the double bar (instead of
beeing apart from it). I guess this as something to do with the skips
needed so that the new clefs get printed after the double bar, but I
can't see what I can do to get rid of that huge space between the
incipit and the main body...
Use
\set Staff.forceClef = ##t
\once \override Staff.Clef #'full-size-change = ##t
to get a clef without using skips. Wait a second, you already do that.
I have to think a bit more about why you use the skips.
3) If, in the Incipit, the stems of neomensural note were centered
with the note heads. In Lilypond's user manual, here,
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.8/Documentation/user/lilypond/Ancient-note-heads.html#Ancient-note-heads
it is said that "The neomensural style differs from the baroque style
in that it uses rhomboidal heads for whole notes and all smaller
durations. Stems are centered on the note heads." An exemple is
given, for neomensural style, but the stems are NOT centered on the
note heads. I think it is a bug... Is there a way I can center them
manually?
It seems that this bug has already been fixed and should not appear in the
coming 2.8.6 version.
In the meantime, it should always be possible to move the stem using
\override Stem #'extra-offset = #'(-0.5 . 0 )
or whatever value (I can't test it here, since I have compiled my own
version
of LilyPond using the latest version of the source code from the CVS
server,
where the bug already is solved).
/Mats