Fw: Lilypond store?

[Stewart Holmes]

> > On 7/5/06, Stewart Holmes <address@hidden> wrote:
> > > > I suggest that you start a discussion thread on mutopia's mailing 
> > > > lists:
> > > > If
> > > > you have constructive ideas on how to create an archive of 
> > > > high-quality
> > > > public domain notes, then I would strongly recommend you to use your 
> > > > ideas
> > > > to
> > > > improve mutopia; if that's not possible, use mutopia as a base for
> > > > creating
> > > > such an archive (i.e., fork the mutopia project).
> > >
> > > Unfortunately I don't really have constructive ideas how to improve it;
> >
> > Well -- and this is a straw-man argument -- there's always the example
> > of SlashDot and other projects with 'community content-filtering'. If
> > the mutopia crew *could*, somehow, establish a system of community
> > review, well then, maybe mutopia could become a repository of really
> > professional-looking stuff.
> >
> > The difficulty, I think, is that it's probably easier to evaluate the
> > wittiness of others' comments (or the relevance of news stories, as on
> > SlashDot) than it is to evaluate the professional-ness of music
> > engraving. So even if mutopia set up some sort of community filtering,
> > it's not clear that the filtering would work.
> >
> > Dunno.
To an extent yes... but some of Mutopia's scores are so badly done that I
really don't know how they were accepted in the first place. I hate to user
another's work as an example in this case, but I think it's the best way to
illustrate my point:
http://www.mutopiaproject.org/ftp/SorF/O1/sor_op_1_5_2/sor_op_1_5_2-a4.pdf

Stewart