|
From: | Kieren MacMillan |
Subject: | Re: Minimum padding after barlines for notes with accidentals? |
Date: | Wed, 13 Sep 2006 11:58:08 -0400 |
Hi, Rick:
Yes, now I see it is happening on my left oriented string numbers, andarpeggios too. I think I'll wait for a more global fix from a developer, (even if I have to try to do one of those complicated "call back" fixes),rather than spend a week re-editing every measure and all future work.
I, too, would love a global fix! However, I've had too many time- sensitive engravings to get out the door (commisisons, etc.) in the meantime, so I went ahead with all the manual tweaks.
Maybe this post belongs on the bug list, pretty serious IMO.
I've cross-posted; we'll see what happens! =) Best, Kieren.
Kieren MacMillan wrote:Hi, Rick!There is a problem with notes that both start a measure and have an accidental. [...] I can't be the first one to notice it).If you search the archives, you'll see that I've asked this question a number of times.And it's also true of other "left-side attachements", e.g., arpeggios.I've yet to receive a satisfactory response/solution/explanation. =\ What I've been doing in the meantime is manually tweaking the X- extent of the Accidental (or BarLine) to force the padding, e.g. \once \override Accidental #'X-extent = #'(-2 . 1) bs It's definitely a time-consuming process, but I haven't found a better solution -- if you find one, I'd greatly appreciate hearing about it! =) Best, Kieren. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list address@hidden http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user--View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Minimum-padding- after-barlines-for-notes-with-accidentals--tf2265851.html#a6287966Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User forum at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list address@hidden http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |