[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fragments; quality of png, and unuseable eps, when using --preview
From: |
Rick Hansen (aka RickH) |
Subject: |
Re: Fragments; quality of png, and unuseable eps, when using --preview |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Oct 2006 07:30:31 -0700 (PDT) |
Thanks,
I did not actually try to print the document that was referencing the eps.
I did not bother because I could not see it on the screen, but I'll try that
later. Maybe I'll even try "printing" to my virtual PDF printer that
converts any applications printed output into a PDF. Since in the end all
my Word docs are printed to PDF then I use ghost to assemble the PDF's into
books anyway. I can live with the EPS as an empty rectangle in the edited
document.
Brett Duncan-2 wrote:
>
> Rick Hansen (aka RickH) wrote:
>> v2.9.22 (Win XP)
>>
>> I'm using the following command lines to create small musical fragments
>> that
>> I can later reference in a word processor document that has text and
>> various
>> musical excerpts:
>>
>> EXAMPLE BEGIN
>>
>> To make a small useseable PNG snippet:
>>
>> "C:\Program Files\LilyPond\usr\bin\lilypond-windows.exe" --png -p
>> "C:\Job015\smallsnippet.ly"
>>
>> To make a small EPS snippet:
>>
>> "C:\Program Files\LilyPond\usr\bin\lilypond-windows.exe" -b eps
>> -dno-gs-load-fonts -dinclude-eps-fonts "C:\Job015\smallsnippet.ly"
>>
>> EXAMPLE END
>>
>>
>> It's working great, except that the PNG files produced seem a little bit
>> "fuzzy" to me.
>>
>> Is it my imagination, (my eyes are not as good as they were 40 years
>> ago)?
>> Is the quality of the PNG output a little on the low side? Can the
>> default
>> quality level be upped easily for a future release?
>>
>> Also I tried imbedding the accompanying .EPS file that is also outputted
>> by
>> the above command. But in my word processor they show up as a blank
>> rectangle (Microsoft Word, Win XP). I have a suspician that the fonts
>> are
>> somehow not available in the EPS for Word to render properly, but the
>> file
>> sizes are around 200k for just a one measure snippet, so thats probably
>> the
>> fonts.
>>
>> Anyone else have these similar problem using musical fragments as either
>> EPS
>> or PNG?
>>
>> Ideally I would like to use the EPS files for embedding in other
>> documents
>> (because I assume they are lossless in terms of future quality). But I
>> would need a fix for the possible bug with why the EPS files show up
>> blank?
>> For the time being the slightly fuzzy PNG files will have to do, until I
>> can
>> track down the EPS problem.
>>
>> (Note: the EPS command above I got straight from the user manual)
>>
>> Thanks to anyone who has already gone down this path and can provide some
>> insight on either the PNG or EPS problems I'm having.
>>
>>
>> Rick
>
> The default resolution for PNG appears to be 101 dpi. After the --png
> flag in your command, add
>
> -dresolution=300
>
> to get 300 dpi, or whatever you prefer.
>
> Even though you can set the resolution to whatever you like, I'd also
> like the default to something like 300.
>
> The fuzziness, however, may or may not be the PNG resolution.
>
> I did some work for a friend who's been creating a learning kit based on
> the music of Ross Edwards - he also found Microsoft Word rather
> frustrating. Even though the scores and snippets that myself and another
> friend passed to him were all 600 dpi (mine from LP, my friend's from
> Sibelius), when he went to print the document, all the scores and
> snippets were fuzzy, both on-screen and printed. However, when we
> transferred the document to my laptop and printed it, everything came
> out beautifully (especially the LP bits ;-) ).
>
> Now, do you think we could isolate the difference between how Word was
> set up on my laptop and on my friend's? I wish.
>
> I don't know enough about EPS to really comment on those problems,
> sorry, but did you try printing them? - EPS files may still print
> correctly (on a Postscript printer, of course), even if they do not
> display anything more than a bounding box.
>
> Also, I noticed you said you wanted EPS because of losslessness - PNG is
> also a lossless format, and personally I'd rather work with PNG than EPS
> any day.
>
> Brett
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Fragments--quality-of-png%2C-and-unuseable-eps%2C-when-using---preview-tf2410999.html#a6737647
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.