Re: Constructive Criticism and a Question

[Frédéric Chiasson]

I tried the function and I don't see any incoherence using \tuplet instead of \times in this situation. Maybe I don't understand the point well.

For me, I wouldn't mid at all to replace entirely the \times function by a \tuplet function, giving both options of using a fraction (2/3) or the engraved ratio (3:2).

Frédéric

2006/12/19, Mats Bengtsson <address@hidden>:

Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>>>   \tuplet 3:2 {...}
>>>
>>>
>> One minor detail is that the name isn't exactly appropriate when you
>> do
>> \set tupletSpannerDuration = #(ly:make-moment 1 4)
>> \times 2/3 {c8 d e f e d e f g f e d }
>>
>
> Well, in that case just stay with \times.
>
>
I thought the proposal was to completely get rid of \times and replace it
by \tuplet (which I think is a good idea). Just wanted to see if anybody
had any bright idea on a command name that's accurate also in this
special case.

   /Mats


>     Werner
>

--
=============================================
        Mats Bengtsson
        Signal Processing
        Signals, Sensors and Systems
        Royal Institute of Technology
        SE-100 44  STOCKHOLM
        Sweden
        Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463
        Fax:   (+46) 8 790 7260
        Email: address@hidden
        WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe
=============================================



_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user