lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Possible Sponsorship : Simplifying Triplets Input (Was: "\times" vs "\tu


From: Valentin Villenave
Subject: Possible Sponsorship : Simplifying Triplets Input (Was: "\times" vs "\tuplet")
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 19:02:40 +0100

Hi everybody,
for years I've been looking for missing features to be sponsored, or
any other way I could support LilyPond besides using it and talking
about it everywhere I go to everybody I see...
The recent discussion about the "\times" function gave me an idea I
already exposed here. Let me just synthesize it one more time:

Here's the point : for beginners or guys like me who write very,
_very_ simple rhythms, typing "\times 2/3" each time you want to input
something as trivial as a triplet is still a bit complicated (well,
you can think I'm lazy, but every software has to deal with lazy
users, hasn't it).

2007/1/18, Erik Sandberg <address@hidden>:
it's easy to write a separate function
\triplet {f8 g a}
for this purpose.
(IMHO, this would be a useful addition to the standard lily distribution)

This would indeed be a very much valuable addition. No matter how easy
it would be to do it, do you "non-lazy" guys think it would be worth
adding it?

_Or_ there is still my original idea, which was to keep the single
\times function, but to give the user the ability to not specify any
tuplet argument:

"If you do not specify a tuplet argument, the argument last entered is
used for the next tuplet. The argument of the first tuplet in input
defaults to 2/3."

Maybe you'll think it would just make things more complicated. Anyway,
I'd be glad to sponsor either of those two choices, if this can help.

Regards,
Valentin Villenave




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]