[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Glissando notation?
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: |
Re: Glissando notation? |
Date: |
Wed, 31 Jan 2007 17:07:51 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20061219) |
Trevor Bača escreveu:
> 1. The heavy lifting of the program implemented in (compiled) C++ code
> with tweaks being made in (interpreted, dynamic) Scheme code.
> Capitalized names in lily input generally refer to the C++ guts while
> other properties in overrides talk directly to the Scheme code. Beyond
do you mean \consists "Foo_engraver" ?
It might make sense to mangle those names, so we have uniform,
scheme style naming for that too.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
LilyPond Software Design
-- Code for Music Notation
http://www.lilypond-design.com