[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Catching error messages
From: |
Cameron Horsburgh |
Subject: |
Re: Catching error messages |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Feb 2007 21:30:09 +1100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 12:09:39PM +0100, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> don't; -dlog-file=foo is the recommended method. -dseparate-log-files if
> you need multiple logs.
I might have this wrong, but I have problems with each of these:
lilypond -dlog-file=log foo.ly
runs as expected, but no log is left, even if foo.ly contains errors.
lilypond -dseparate-log-files foo.ly bar.ly
also compiles cleanly, but I get a warning --
warning: no such internal option: separate-log-files
and no log files.
Thoughts?
--
=============================================
Cameron Horsburgh
=============================================
- Catching error messages, Cameron Horsburgh, 2007/02/11
- Re: Catching error messages, Geoff Horton, 2007/02/11
- Re: Catching error messages, Graham Percival, 2007/02/11
- Re: Catching error messages, Cameron Horsburgh, 2007/02/11
- Re: Catching error messages, Graham Percival, 2007/02/11
- Re: Catching error messages, Cameron Horsburgh, 2007/02/11
- Re: Catching error messages, Graham Percival, 2007/02/12
- Re: Catching error messages, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2007/02/12
- Re: Catching error messages,
Cameron Horsburgh <=
- Re: Catching error messages, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2007/02/14
- Re: Catching error messages, Cameron Horsburgh, 2007/02/14
- Re: Catching error messages, Graham Percival, 2007/02/14