[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Script and staff-pading question
From: |
Dmytro O. Redchuk |
Subject: |
Re: Script and staff-pading question |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Apr 2007 14:32:01 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 12:41:54PM +0200, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> As you can notice at the chart of all available scripts in the section
> on "Articulation",
> some articulations stay close to the note head, whereas others always
> are typeset
> above/below the stave. The staff-padding property is only in effect for the
> articulations that always are typeset outside the stave, such as
> staccatissimo,
> stopped, turn and lost of others. Once you think of it, this design
> choice in
> LilyPond makes sense.
>
> The obvious follow-up question is how LilyPond determines which
> articulations
> should follow the note head into the stave and which should stay outside.
> The answer can be found in the initalization file scm/script.scm, where
> the articulations that should follow the note head have the property
> quantize-position set.
>
> /Mats
Thank You, Mats, thanks a lot :-)
--
_,-=._ /|_/|
`-.} `=._,.-=-._., @ @._,
`._ _,-. ) _,.-'
` G.m-"^m`m' Dmytro O. Redchuk