|
From: | Kieren MacMillan |
Subject: | Re: beginning-of-measure padding value? |
Date: | Thu, 19 Apr 2007 09:05:10 -0400 |
Hello, all --
I hope you have seen the earlier followups in this email thread [...]
Fair enough, but it's a *lot* more work in recent versions to have a acceptable-looking score (with respect to initial measure spacing) than it was in previous versions.
For example, I've included a screenshot of untweaked Lilypond output for an instrumental part I cranked out yesterday -- you'll see that the initial spacing is totally unacceptable without a good deal of tweaking (the rests are almost completely swallowed by the key signature); in other parts of the score, it is nearly impossible to distinguish the barline from the left-hand side of the leading flat; etc.
Cheers, Kieren.p.s. Once the show opens (this weekend), and I have more time, I'll submit specific bug reports...
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |