[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Measure number collision
From: |
Maximilian Albert |
Subject: |
Re: Measure number collision |
Date: |
Sun, 22 Apr 2007 21:49:33 +0200 |
User-agent: |
IceDove 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070329) |
Graham Percival schrieb:
> This has been fixed in 2.11; please wait until the next stable release
> (2.12) comes out.
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=98&can=1&q=collision%20numbers
On that page it says that the fix already happend in 2.11.5. Looking at
the git diff output, Joe at that time introduced the line
(outside-staff-priority . 100)
in the settings for BarNumber in scm/define-grobs.scm. Later, however,
it was removed again with the following explanation in the log:
"BarNumbers collide with a treble clef's bounding box but not with the
treble clef itself so setting outside-staff-priority pushes them up too
much."
Reinserting the above line manually in scm/define-grobs.scm and
comparing it with Mats' solution yields exactly the same result for
staves with brackets, but for ungrouped staves it does indeed look ugly.
Is there an easy way to make this setting only work in the former case?
(Hm, probably not, otherwise it would probably already be implemented;))
Of course, it's not a big deal to add the padding property manually to
each score if needed, but I think eventually lily should be able to
detect these cases itself.
Max
- Measure number collision, Jason Merrill, 2007/04/22
- Re: Measure number collision, Graham Percival, 2007/04/22
- Re: Measure number collision, Zoltán Selyem, 2007/04/22
- Re: Measure number collision,
Maximilian Albert <=
- Re: Measure number collision, Joe Neeman, 2007/04/22
- Re: Measure number collision, Maximilian Albert, 2007/04/22
- Re: Measure number collision, Graham Percival, 2007/04/22
- Re: Measure number collision, Arvid Grøtting, 2007/04/23
- Re: Measure number collision, Joe Neeman, 2007/04/23
- Re: Measure number collision, Werner LEMBERG, 2007/04/23
- Re: Measure number collision, Joe Neeman, 2007/04/23
- Re: Measure number collision, Werner LEMBERG, 2007/04/23
- Re: Measure number collision, Joe Neeman, 2007/04/23
- Re: Measure number collision, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2007/04/24