[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Measure number collision
From: |
Joe Neeman |
Subject: |
Re: Measure number collision |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Apr 2007 22:59:45 +1000 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.5 |
On Monday 23 April 2007 14:38, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> > The solution for this is to use more accurate glyph outlines than
> > bounding boxes. I hope to do this at some point, but it is
> > non-trivial.
>
> Making metafont emit improved data on glyph outlines is quite easy.
> The very question is *what* shall it emit...
>
> Can you elaborate on this?
If it could emit a list of line segments that approximates the boundary of the
glyph, that would be _very_ useful.
- Re: Measure number collision, (continued)
- Re: Measure number collision, Zoltán Selyem, 2007/04/22
- Re: Measure number collision, Maximilian Albert, 2007/04/22
- Re: Measure number collision, Joe Neeman, 2007/04/22
- Re: Measure number collision, Maximilian Albert, 2007/04/22
- Re: Measure number collision, Graham Percival, 2007/04/22
- Re: Measure number collision, Arvid Grøtting, 2007/04/23
- Re: Measure number collision, Joe Neeman, 2007/04/23
- Re: Measure number collision, Werner LEMBERG, 2007/04/23
- Re: Measure number collision,
Joe Neeman <=
- Re: Measure number collision, Werner LEMBERG, 2007/04/23
- Re: Measure number collision, Joe Neeman, 2007/04/23
- Re: Measure number collision, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2007/04/24
- Re: Measure number collision, Werner LEMBERG, 2007/04/25