Re: question about the documentation

[Till Rettig]

ok, this sounds resonable, I just didn't understand the passage. So to 
say: within a fifth means that it can be a second, third, and fourth, 
but not a fifth.
Thanks for the explanations.

Till

Valentin Villenave wrote:
> 2007/5/12, Till Rettig <address@hidden>:
> >  Hi,
> >
> >  while translating I found this sentence in the Docs Version 2.11.23 
> > chapter
> > 6.1.7:
>
> >  What does the fifth do here? Wouldn't it be better to say: "inside 
> > the same
> > octave" or something like this?  It seems I don't understand this 
> > passage.
> > Why is it suddenly a fifth and not a fourth anymore?
>
> In French, we translated "within a fifth" by "moins d'une quinte"
> ("less than a fifth" in English) , which is maybe more easily
> understandable...
> Valentin Villenave