Re: tied note accidentals after line break

[Graham Percival]

This is a known issue,
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=381&can=2&q=accidental

Cheers,
- Graham

Tao Cumplido wrote:
> Well, in this example from the Regression tests it does.
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.10/input/regression/lily-dd43efc1a7.ly
>
> And so it did in my score, which I actually have never seen before, so I found 
> it quite strange not to have an accidental style which solves this.
>
> Actually I solved the problem myself later.
> I think I used '\override Accidental #'after-line-break = ##f'.
>
> Hmm, I just checked the same example from above in the regression tests of 
> version 2.11 and the accidental is indeed not printed after the line break, 
> although it says that it should.
>
> regards,
>
> Tao
>
>
>
> -------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 17:43:52 +0200
> Von: "Valentin Villenave" <address@hidden>
> An: "address@hidden" <address@hidden>
> CC: address@hidden
> Betreff: Re: tied note accidentals after line break
>
> > 2007/6/14, address@hidden <address@hidden>:
> > > hello,
> > Hi Tao,
> >
> > sorry for not having answered sooner; the list is quiet today, so it
> > gives more time to look for unanswered posts.
> >
> > > is there a general way to prevent accidentals of tied notes from being
> > printed after a line break?
> >
> > I don't really understand what you're talking about; when I try the
> > following snippet the accidental is not printed again after the line
> > break.
> >
> > { c1 d e fis ~ \break fis2 g e 2 }
> >
> > Can you tell us more about it?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Valentin