[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Semicircle (or fermata w/o dot)
From: |
Valentin Villenave |
Subject: |
Re: Semicircle (or fermata w/o dot) |
Date: |
Sat, 14 Jul 2007 00:30:42 +0200 |
2007/7/13, Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden>:
Why not using the `semicirculus' glyph from the parmesan font? I
think this is better than using explicit PS code...
AFAIK, the \semicirculus is upside down compared to what Bert's
looking for; so in that case one would have to rotate it by 180°
(which might, or might not, be simpler than explicit Postscript). Or
am i wrong?
Valentin
- Semicircle (or fermata w/o dot), Bertalan Fodor, 2007/07/13
- Re: Semicircle (or fermata w/o dot), Valentin Villenave, 2007/07/13
- Re: Semicircle (or fermata w/o dot), Valentin Villenave, 2007/07/13
- Re: Semicircle (or fermata w/o dot), Bertalan Fodor, 2007/07/13
- Re: Semicircle (or fermata w/o dot), Valentin Villenave, 2007/07/13
- Re: Semicircle (or fermata w/o dot), Werner LEMBERG, 2007/07/13
- Re: Semicircle (or fermata w/o dot),
Valentin Villenave <=
- Re: Semicircle (or fermata w/o dot), Bertalan Fodor, 2007/07/14
- Re: Semicircle (or fermata w/o dot), Valentin Villenave, 2007/07/14
- Re: Semicircle (or fermata w/o dot), Werner LEMBERG, 2007/07/15
Re: Semicircle (or fermata w/o dot), Werner LEMBERG, 2007/07/13