Re: GDP: six

[Graham Percival]

Valentin Villenave wrote:
> 2007/9/14, Juergen Reuter <address@hidden>:
>
> > Ancient notation _could_ be split genre-wise into two separate chunks
> > "Gregorian Chant" and "Mensural Notation".  However, for a _reference_
> > manual, I think it is ok as it currently is (e.g. having a single section
> > on ligatures rather than separate ones per genre).  For a _tutorial_,
> > however, IMO you definitely would like to split it genre-wise.
>
> I would be OK to split the Ancient notation. Thanks for suggesting,
> btw; feel free to suggest any other improvement you might think of,
> since this whole part would otherwise remain more or less untouched --
> as most of us, when it comes to such subjects, are complete
> ignoramuses ;)

Actually, I'd rather leave Ancient notation completely untouched until 
somebody knowledgeable about it has the time to deal with it.  (that 
doesn't just mean Juergen; there's other people around that use this)


In any case, I think it's safe to leave it alone until GDP would 
naturally get to that section -- that will probably be in Dec or Jan.

Cheers,
- Graham