[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GDP: partial rearrangement done, technical problems
From: |
Eyolf Østrem |
Subject: |
Re: GDP: partial rearrangement done, technical problems |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Sep 2007 14:23:52 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13cvs-muttng (2007-01-26) |
On 20.09.2007 (00:55), Graham Percival wrote:
> GENERAL DISCUSSION
> - I still like the division of musical notation / instrument-specific? No?
I have nothing against it, as long as vocal music isn't stuffed in
there. :-)
> - Assuming that the technical issues are solved, how do you want these
> merged subsections to look? Specifically, consider 1.2.3. Displaying
> rhythms. There's
> Time signature
> - @commonprop
> - @seealso
> - @refbugs
> Upbeats
> - @refbugs
> Unmetered music
> - @refbugs
> ...
> Automatic note splitting
> - @refbugs
> - @seealso
> Do you like this format, or would you prefer one @commonprop at the end of
> each page?
I think it should be next to where the properties that are "commonly
tweaked" are described.
That particular section reminded me of something that's been bugging
me before: Lilypond has many defaults, which is fine, but somehting
like:
Setting it to #'() uses fraction style for 4/4 and 2/2 time,
just makes me wonder: "why!?!" This is one of those cases where the
middle ground is missing between the beginner (who would take it as a piece of
information and that's that) and the programmer (who would know how to
look up the program reference.
> Do you want links to LSR stuff at the end of each portion, or
> just one set of links at the bottom of the page?
I don't mind.
> ... and are you guys _sure_ you prefer the manual like this?
Other than that I still don't like the headings "Displaying ..."
Thanks to the defaults, you are, for all intents and purposes,
displaying a rhythm by writing "c8", aren't you? For some of the
topics something like "Modifying the display/presentation..." might
work, but I'd like to see the reader who would go to a heading like
that to find out how to write a key signature.
Eyolf
--
Q: How many mathematicians does it take to screw in a light bulb?
A: One. He gives it to six Californians, thereby reducing the problem
to the earlier joke.
Re: GDP: partial rearrangement done, technical problems, Trevor Bača, 2007/09/21