Re: I'd like some collisions!

[Graham Percival]

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/list?can=2&q=collision

However, as you already see, collisions get fixed occasionally, which 
makes such docs obsolete.  Please try to isolate discussion about 
specific collision to one paragraph.  ie don't have a whole section 
talking about vertical collisions (as it is right now); instead, have

blah blah general collisions...

blah blah extra-offset vs x-offset...

examples

blah blah dynamics and kneed beams...

[lilypond example]

blah blah noteheads with four voices...

[lilypnode example]



That way we can easily comment out the single paragraph+example that 
demonstrates the workaround, whenever that bug is fixed.

Cheers,
- Graham

Trevor Daniels wrote:
> I'm finding in rewriting the parts of the manual that deal
> with correcting collisions that many of the old examples no
> longer "work", ie the new skylining code deals with them all
> correctly, at least to the extent that the objects no longer
> collide.  So I'm looking for examples of 'collisions' that
> still actually collide in the later 2.11 releases.  I have a
> few, but they are all either rather esoteric or rather
> artificial.  Any contributions of genuine collisions in real
> music would be gratefully received!
>
> Trevor D
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user