[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: collision, is there a workaround?
From: |
Mats Bengtsson |
Subject: |
Re: collision, is there a workaround? |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Jan 2008 10:37:52 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (X11/20070716) |
Your example can be reduced to
\version "2.11.37"
\relative c''' { a8\rest ais4 }
which shows the same bug, namely a collision between the rest
and the note (which only seems to happen if the pitch is high enough so that
the note gets a ledger line). This is a regression against 2.10.33.
Strangely enough, you can't use standard tricks like
\once \override Score.SeparationItem #'padding = #1
to add some spacing between the notes. The only solution I could find was
to add the following before the rest:
\once \override Rest #'X-extent = #'(0 . 1.5)
/Mats
Ole Schmidt wrote:
Dear all,
in the third bar on the first beat is a collision in the upper voice
(between the rest and the bis).
Is this is known issue? Does this have to do with the usage of
\partcombine? Is there a workaround?
thanks for help
best
ole
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\version "2.11.36"
\layout { ragged-right = ##t }
testfile = \new Staff {
\set Staff.printPartCombineTexts = ##f
\time 6/4
\clef "G_8"
\partcombine
\relative c' {
R1.|
r2
\times 2/3 { r8 gis'4( } cis,4) r2 |
\times 2/3 { r8 bis'4( } gis4~ gis fis ~ fis) r4 |
}
\relative c' {
R1.| r2 r2 r4 b~( | b~ \times 2/3 { b8 cis4~ } cis4 cis e!) r |
} }
\score {
\testfile
}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
--
=============================================
Mats Bengtsson
Signal Processing
Signals, Sensors and Systems
Royal Institute of Technology
SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM
Sweden
Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463
Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260
Email: address@hidden
WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe
=============================================
- collision, is there a workaround?, Ole Schmidt, 2008/01/09
- Re: collision, is there a workaround?,
Mats Bengtsson <=
- Re: collision, is there a workaround?, Damian leGassick, 2008/01/10
- Re: collision, is there a workaround?, Mats Bengtsson, 2008/01/10
- Re: collision, is there a workaround?, Valentin Villenave, 2008/01/10
- Re: collision, is there a workaround?, Mats Bengtsson, 2008/01/10
- Re: collision, is there a workaround?, Valentin Villenave, 2008/01/10
- Re: collision, is there a workaround?, Mats Bengtsson, 2008/01/10