Re: Smarter cross-staff Beam 'positions?

[Mats Bengtsson]

Trevor Bača wrote:
> Is there a way to get "normal" (noncrosss-staff) beams to likewise sit 
> at that same vertical position?
>
> (IOW, I'm looking for both flat and vertically aligned; Rune's #+inf.0 
> gets flat ... now for the vertically aligned part?)
That sounds like en excellent example of when you want to use positions, 
right?

  /Mats