Re: suggestion for LM 5.1.3

[Andrew Hawryluk]

Good point about the rehearsal marks. I guess I was thinking ahead to
the task of printing individual intrunetal parts with many \book
blocks in a single file.

Andrew

On 2/13/08, Trevor Daniels <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> OK, thanks, Andrew.  I've noted this for the next revision
> of that section (and Mats' later amendment).
>
> Trevor D
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: address@hidden
> > [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+t.daniels=treda.co.u
> > address@hidden Behalf Of
> > Andrew Hawryluk
> > Sent: 13 February 2008 05:40
> > To: lilypond-user Mailinglist
> > Subject: suggestion for LM 5.1.3
> >
> >
> > Under LM 5.1.3 "Large projects" could we include
> > something like this?
> > It might also fit under 5.1.4 "Saving typing with
> > variables and
> > functions". Either way, I didn't discover this
> > simple idea until I was
> > browsing through the mailing list, and it would
> > have saved me some
> > trouble. (I was adding rehearsal marks to each
> > instrument's music
> > variable. How embarrassing!)
> >
> > -Andrew
> >
> >
> > *** start draft text ***
> >
> > In large projects, you can combine several
> > reusable variables to make
> > a single staff of music. For example, if three
> > trumpet lines have the
> > same dynamics we could create a single variable
> > that holds only the
> > dynamic indications separated by skips. Likewise,
> > if rehearsal marks
> > are needed, they will be the same for all instruments.
> >
> > trumpetdynamics = { s1\f s1*10 s1\mp }
> > rehearsalmarks = {s8 \mark \default }
> > ...
> > \score { <<
> >     \new Staff { << \firsttrumpetnotes
> > \trumpetdynamics \rehearsalmarks >> }
> >     \new Staff { << \secondtrumpetnotes
> > \trumpetdynamics \rehearsalmarks >> }
> > >> }
> >
> > *** end draft text ***
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > lilypond-user mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
> >
>
>
>