[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GDP: info about controlling direciton / placement
From: |
Francisco Vila |
Subject: |
Re: GDP: info about controlling direciton / placement |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Feb 2008 18:56:24 +0100 |
2008/2/18, Graham Percival <address@hidden>:
> > What about "controlling position"?
>
> If there's consensus about this, I'm happy with that.
>
> The original title was "Up and down", but I thought that was silly.
> Calling it "Controlling vertical {direction/position}" might be
> possible, but then it seems to exclude setting the horizontal
> position... although there are very few such cases. (maybe fingering?)
For me, the word "direction" does not include issues such as
right-aligning or above/below positions of elements. Direction seems
to indicate an inherent movement, left-to-right, upwards, and so on.
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
http://www.paconet.org
- GDP: info about controlling direciton / placement, Graham Percival, 2008/02/14
- Re: GDP: info about controlling direciton / placement, Nicholas WASTELL, 2008/02/15
- Re: GDP: info about controlling direciton / placement, Graham Percival, 2008/02/15
- Re: GDP: info about controlling direciton / placement, Mats Bengtsson, 2008/02/18
- Re: GDP: info about controlling direciton / placement, Kieren MacMillan, 2008/02/18
- Re: GDP: info about controlling direciton / placement, Graham Percival, 2008/02/18
- Re: GDP: info about controlling direciton / placement,
Francisco Vila <=
- RE: GDP: info about controlling direciton / placement, Trevor Daniels, 2008/02/18
- Re: GDP: info about controlling direciton / placement, Graham Percival, 2008/02/18
RE: info about controlling direciton / placement, Trevor Daniels, 2008/02/15
Re: GDP: info about controlling direciton / placement, Mats Bengtsson, 2008/02/15