lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GDP: NR 1.1 comment


From: Mats Bengtsson
Subject: Re: GDP: NR 1.1 comment
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 21:23:48 +0100
User-agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.0.5)

Quoting Till Rettig <address@hidden>:

Hi,

I just noticed that the staff contexts of the examples in 1.1.3.5 are PianoStaff. In 1.6 there is only mentioned GrandStaff. Which one is the preferred one to be used? I would mention both in 1.6, but I think we should develop guidelines which context names to use. Maybe the PianoStaff is (at least to others than English native speakers) more understandable? So the context would be called PianoStaff in 1.6.1 but I would also mention that there is a GrandStaff context?
So far I have understood that they are both equal. Is this true?

In version 2.11, the only difference between the two is that PianoStaff contains the instrument name engraver. In version 2.10 and earlier, there were more differences. The PianoStaff then produced a fixed distance between the staves, since the cross-staff
slurs and beams didn't work otherwise. This limitation has been fixed
in 2.11.

  /Mats





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]