Re: GDP: \articulation and -\articulation

[Graham Percival]

On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:39:21 -0500
Bryan Stanbridge <address@hidden> wrote:

> Graham Percival wrote:
> > 
> > Should we keep the - version in the docs at all?  Does it really add
> > anything (especially since most people use the plain \ version) ?
 >
> We might want to keep the -\ version, because it can be used in 
> sequences of modifiers after notes. Sometimes Lily doesn't "like" it 
> when you want to do something like
> { c'\mp\fermata\accent\markup {\bold "forcefully"} }

Interesting!  However, as this example indicates, it's not
specific to articulations.  We'll add info to LM 3 and
NR 3 about this.

Since there's nothing specific about articulations here, we'll
remove it from NR 1.3.

Cheers,
- Graham