[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Comments in GDP, Was: comments
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: Comments in GDP, Was: comments |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Feb 2008 12:34:51 -0800 |
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 11:19:04 +0100
"James E. Bailey" <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 28.02.2008, at 11:07, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
>
> > Did you search for "Comment" in the index of the Tutorial?
> >
> > However, you are right that it seems to be missing in the NR,
> > where it also should be included for completeness.
I've added a FIXME for NR 3.
> Learning manual. Gotcha. Just out of curiosity, why are these split
> up?
Search the mailist archives.
> For example, what is the difference between a "user manual" and a
> "learning manual"?
We're not using the term "user manual", but obviously I didn't
change it somewhere. It shoudl be "Notation Reference" everywhere,
which gives a much better hint about its purpose.
Cheers,
- Graham
- comments, James E. Bailey, 2008/02/28
- Re: comments, Simon Bailey, 2008/02/28
- Comments in GDP, Was: comments, Mats Bengtsson, 2008/02/28
- Re: Comments in GDP, Was: comments, James E. Bailey, 2008/02/28
- Re: Comments in GDP, Was: comments,
Graham Percival <=
- Re: Comments in GDP, Was: comments, Nicholas WASTELL, 2008/02/29
- RE: Comments in GDP, Was: comments, Trevor Daniels, 2008/02/29
- Re: Comments in GDP, Was: comments, Graham Percival, 2008/02/29