Re: GDP: A question about Engravers

[Graham Percival]

On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 00:02:43 +0000
"Neil Puttock" <address@hidden> wrote:

> I can write \consists Span_arpeggio_engraver or \consists
> "Span_arpeggio_engraver"; LilyPond doesn't seem to mind either way.
> 
> Is there a reason why engravers are enclosed in inverted commas in the
> documentation, when it makes no difference to compilation if they are
> removed?

I think it's just to make them easier to see.  ly/engraver-init.ly
uses double-quotes around all engravers, too.

I've added this to our doc-writing policy.

Cheers,
- Graham