[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: StaffSymbol: behaviour of ledger-line-thickness
From: |
till Rettig |
Subject: |
Re: StaffSymbol: behaviour of ledger-line-thickness |
Date: |
Tue, 01 Apr 2008 13:31:42 +0200 |
thanks for the quick answer. I tried now to figure out how to apply changes to
StaffSymbol properties. It seems they work only as \with \override for a new
staff or inside the layout block. That would mean that they cannot be changed
on the fly but are preset for every score. Is this correct?
Till
-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 18:32:51 +0200
> Von: Reinhold Kainhofer <address@hidden>
> An: address@hidden, "till Rettig" <address@hidden>
> Betreff: Re: StaffSymbol: behaviour of ledger-line-thickness
> Am Montag, 31. März 2008 schrieb till Rettig:
> > Hi,
> > could somebody explain me how ledger-line-thickness behaves? The IR
> states
> > that it should be a pair:
> >
> > "ledger-line-thickness (pair of numbers)
> > The thickness of ledger lines. It is the sum of 2 numbers: The first
> is
> > the factor for line thickness, and the second for staff space. Both
> > contributions are added. "
> >
> > But I cannot get the staff space bigger (the second number), instead the
> > first number influences the thickness of the ledger line a bit, the
> second
> > quite much, that is it becomes so heavy that the spaces almost
> disappear.
>
> Yes, because they use different units:
> -) The first one is a multiplier for the default thickness (quite small, ~
> staff-space/10 )
> -) The second one is an explicit width (in staff spaces, i.e. the default
> distance between two staff lines or ledger lines)
>
> The final distance is then:
> ( thickness * line-thickness * #1 ) + #2
>
> Since the default thickness is quite small, of course the first number
> influences the width only a little bit, while the second (measured in
> different units!) increases it a lot.
> Actually, the following two settings produce roughly the same (i.e. ledger
> lines so thick that they touch each other:
>
> \override StaffSymbol #'ledger-line-thickness = #'( 10 . 0 )
> \override StaffSymbol #'ledger-line-thickness = #'( 0 . 1 )
>
>
> And, yes, even Han-Wen agrees that this is confusing. See his comment in
> lily/staff-symbol.cc:
> /*
> For raggedright without ragged staves, simply set width to the
> linewidth.
> (ok -- lousy UI, since width is in staff spaces)
> --hwn.
> */
>
> > the second
> > quite much, that is it becomes so heavy that the spaces almost
> disappear.
> > Please compare the example:
>
> Things work as expected: The default line width is quite small and the
> first
> number is a multiplier for the default line width. The second one gives an
> additional width in staff space (i.e. the distance between each of the
> five
> lines of a standard staff).
>
> > \override StaffSymbol #' ledger-line-thickness = #' ( 1 . .1 )
>
> This uses the default line width + 1/10 of the staff space = 1/5 staff
> space
>
> > \override StaffSymbol #' ledger-line-thickness = #' ( .1 . 1 )
>
> This decreases the line with to 1/10 of its default (1/100 staff space!),
> but
> adds a full staff space (=distance between two ledger lines!), so of
> course
> all ledger lines touch each other.
>
>
> Cheers,
> Reinhold
> --
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> Reinhold Kainhofer, Vienna University of Technology, Austria
> email: address@hidden, http://reinhold.kainhofer.com/
> * Financial and Actuarial Mathematics, TU Wien,
> http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at/
> * K Desktop Environment, http://www.kde.org, KOrganizer maintainer
> * Chorvereinigung "Jung-Wien", http://www.jung-wien.at/
--
Psssst! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger gehört?
Der kann`s mit allen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimessenger
- Re: StaffSymbol: behaviour of ledger-line-thickness,
till Rettig <=