Re: GDP: Time to plan the revision of NR 2 "Specialist Notation"

[Valentin Villenave]

2008/4/3, Graham Percival <address@hidden>:

>  Maybe add a "Constructs often used by" subsubsection, which gives
>  specific examples (of bowing, breathing, etc) along with links to
>  the earlier sections?

I think this is the best solution.

>  As you all know, I'm not at all fond of duplication in the docs,
>  but I'm having difficulty arguing that "String music" would be
>  easier to understand if we omitted discussion of bowings.  And
>  artificial harmonics, for that matter -- those are covered in
>  Pitches.

I wasn't proposing to duplicate any information, but just to use @refs
everywhere we can to make finding the needed information easier.

Trevor: my point was just to link to NR 1.3.2.3:
"Breathing marks can be obtained using the syntax described in
"Breathing marks".

Admittedly, this is silly, but still, we're talking to
wind-instrument-players -- we have to take that into account :)

Cheers,
Valentin