lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GDP: Time to plan the revision of NR 2 "Specialist Notation"


From: Valentin Villenave
Subject: Re: GDP: Time to plan the revision of NR 2 "Specialist Notation"
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 23:40:34 +0200

2008/4/3, Graham Percival <address@hidden>:

> And bowing, for string players?
>
>  "Bowing may be added to scores like other articulations; for more
>  information, see @ref{articulations and ornamentations}.  The
>  exact names of bowings are described in @ref{List of articulations}."
>  ?
>
>  Once a reader figures out the above, he'll be wondering why we
>  didn't they just write
>  c2\upbow
>  c2\downbow

?
Seems consistent to me... Do you mean you don't like this sentence?

Was it meant to be a joke? If so, I don't find it more ridiculous than
the other documentation-style sentences you make me write :)

Cheers,
Valentin




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]