[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: *.mid vs *.midi
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: *.mid vs *.midi |
Date: |
Thu, 15 May 2008 23:23:13 -0700 |
On Thu, 15 May 2008 22:55:50 -0700
Michael David Crawford <address@hidden> wrote:
> But when Apple bought NeXT from Steve Jobs, the Cocoa framework that
> became Mac OS X knew nothing of types and creator codes. Now the Mac
> is borked in the same way windows is.
Yes and no. The underlying OS still knows what the files are:
tsubasa:~/tmp gperciva$ ls foo.mi*
foo.mid foo.midi
tsubasa:~/tmp gperciva$ file foo.mi*
foo.mid: Standard MIDI data (format 1) using 3 tracks at 1/384
foo.midi: Standard MIDI data (format 1) using 3 tracks at 1/384
tsubasa:~/tmp gperciva$ mv foo.mid foo.txt
tsubasa:~/tmp gperciva$ file foo.txt
foo.txt: Standard MIDI data (format 1) using 3 tracks at 1/384
tsubasa:~/tmp gperciva$
I can double-click on both foo.mi* files and have Quicktime open
up and play the files. However, trying to open foo.txt results in
TextEdit popping up.
I actualy consider this *more* broken than Windows. I mean,
Windows is just stupid. OSX *isn't* stupid, but it pretends to
be. I have no clue what the Aqua people were up to. :(
Cheers,
- Graham
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, (continued)
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Karl Hammar, 2008/05/14
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Valentin Villenave, 2008/05/14
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, CDon, 2008/05/14
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Karl Hammar, 2008/05/15
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Valentin Villenave, 2008/05/15
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2008/05/15
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, CDon, 2008/05/15
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool), 2008/05/15
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Karl Hammar, 2008/05/15
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Michael David Crawford, 2008/05/16
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi,
Graham Percival <=
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool), 2008/05/16
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2008/05/17
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Hans Aberg, 2008/05/17
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Karl Hammar, 2008/05/17
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Hans Aberg, 2008/05/17
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, immanuel litzroth, 2008/05/17
- Message not available
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Hans Aberg, 2008/05/17
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, immanuel litzroth, 2008/05/18
- Message not available
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Hans Aberg, 2008/05/18
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, immanuel litzroth, 2008/05/18