[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: *.mid vs *.midi
From: |
Valentin Villenave |
Subject: |
Re: *.mid vs *.midi |
Date: |
Sat, 17 May 2008 23:07:47 +0200 |
2008/5/17 Han-Wen Nienhuys <address@hidden>:
> we can have a -dmidi-extension=mid, and change the default for the
> Windows binary.
Another feature that would be greatly appreciated (once again, this is
an idea from the French list) would be the ability to define separate
output paths for midi and .ps/pdf files.
Currently, the -o option does not allow to output midi files in a
separate directory.
Cheers,
Valentin
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, (continued)
- Re: initial .ly files [was Re: *.mid vs *.midi], Hans Aberg, 2008/05/17
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Bertalan Fodor, 2008/05/17
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Hans Aberg, 2008/05/17
- initial .ly files [was Re: *.mid vs *.midi], Karl Hammar, 2008/05/17
- Re: initial .ly files [was Re: *.mid vs *.midi], Hans Aberg, 2008/05/17
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Karl Hammar, 2008/05/17
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi,
Valentin Villenave <=
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Karl Hammar, 2008/05/17
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Valentin Villenave, 2008/05/18
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Hans Aberg, 2008/05/18
- Re: launch scripts (was: *.mid vs *.midi), fiëé visuëlle, 2008/05/18
- Re: launch scripts (was: *.mid vs *.midi), Hans Aberg, 2008/05/18
- Re: launch scripts (was: *.mid vs *.midi), fiëé visuëlle, 2008/05/18
- Re: launch scripts (was: *.mid vs *.midi), Hans Aberg, 2008/05/18
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Hans Aberg, 2008/05/16